An assistant Professor of Philosophy at Rochester Institute of Technology, The Nutty Professor, Lawarence Torcello, says that the funding of global warming denialism is both criminally and morally wrong. He further adds, writing at The Conversation, that “the charge of criminal and moral negligence ought to extend to all activities of the climate deniers who receive funding as part of a sustained campaign to undermine the public’s understanding of scientific consensus.”
In another time and place this nutty professor might have been an Assistant Professor of Eugenics and might have worked for another type of organization where Racial Hygiene and Race Superiority denialism was both criminally and morally wrong.
And in that time, perhaps the charge of criminal and moral negligence was extended to all activities of the Racial Hygiene and Race Superiority deniers who would have received funding as part of a sustained campaign to undermine the public’s understanding of racially based social policy scientific consensus.
Jah. How do you plead? Never mind. No matter. There will be no trial. You are guilty of denialism. You will be executed at dawn for the good of the people.
And yes, perhaps, in the early part of the 20th century had there been more funding for Racial Hygiene and Race Superiority denialism “The Rockefeller Foundation would not have helped, developed, and funded various German eugenics programs, including the one that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz.” Yes, if only.
Perhaps if more people back then had understood the result from the failures in avoiding reasonably foreseeable harms, or the threat of harms to public safety, consequent of certain activities, more than thirty states would not have forced sterilization on its populace and so enamoured 1930s Germany. If only.
In the crazy corrupt and deceitful world of The Nutty Professor, those who purposefully strive to make sure inexact, incomplete, and contradictory information is given to the public are beyond reproach and those that would promote scientific debate debased.
From their point of view, the debate is over. They choose to deny others their free speech. But not to worry though. It’s only a smoke screen. They are worried. They won’t debate because they can’t debate. The debate is over only because they have already lost. But, of course, they won’t tell you that.
The ever louder screams though of climate change by the Global Warming Alarmists are only the result of the failed policies from the deluded minds of social engineers that think that they can still use global warming as an excuse for wealth redistribution on a global scale.
The social engineers want you to spend billions, even trillions of dollars on the global warming initiative, all in the name of equality and fairness.
There are the Three Laws of Global Warming Alarmists:
Global warming is a hoax that must be perpetrated for the good of the people
Global warming deniers must be savagely condemned for the good of the people
Global redistribution of wealth must be accomplished for the good of the people
They will disguise their intentions with feel-good slogans and ideology like cap and trade and save the planet. They will play saint to your villain if you disagree with them.
Afterall, who really doesn’t want to save the planet? With no idea how to actually stop the weather, they want to tax countries anyway that they deem to be polluters (rich) and give that tax revenue to those countries that they deem to be non-polluters (poor), all in the name of global warming. It’s quite a fiendish plan.
They think that their plan will actually work. And though the Global Warming Alarmists will tell you that they want to save the planet, in all reality they don’t know how. The don’t have a clue. And furthermore, they don’t care. All they really care about is taking your money and so that they can give it to someone else. And if they happen to pocket a few bucks along the way, so much the better.
Al Gore, the Global Warming Alarmists’ champion célébrité, is worth an estimated 200 million dollars, much of it earned after he recognized the benefits of impersonating Chicken Little and proclaiming that the world, as we know it, was going to end if we didn’t do something about global warming.
If only they did know something. If only they had a real plan. If only they knew what to do. But they don’t. If they did, they would be taking the trillions of dollars that they want to steal and make something useful, make something real, make something concrete. But they can’t. They don’t know how.
If they knew what they were doing or if they really cared about clean air, they would be terraforming the earth to make it better for all the people. They would be building atmospheric processors just like the ones that are in much of pop culture’s science fiction literature and films. But they have neither the inclination or the know-how. It’s too hard. Redistributing wealth is much easier. They have over a hundred years of experience doing that. And besides, it’s only science fiction, right? Science fiction doesn’t know anything, so nothing good ever comes from science fiction. Ha.
What Global Warming Alarmists do know how to do is lie. The Global Warming Alarmists will lie, lie, and lie again. And if you still don’t believe them they will lie some more. And again, if you still don’t believe them, they will say that you are morally corrupt. They will say that you are criminally corrupt. Those in the Global Warming Alarmists Club Nutjob like The Nutty Professor will say that “it is time for modern societies to interpret and update their legal systems accordingly.” That is what he said. That is what they will say.
However, once upon a time, not so long ago, those that wanted to perpetrate this global redistribution of wealth scam of the century were perplexed about the mechanism as to how to get it done. They thought that they had mastered redistribution of wealth on a smaller scale (i.e., The Soviet Union, China, Cuba, N. Korea, Vietnam) and were happy with the results. But for them, there was work to do. They wanted to go global.
After the Ice Age predictions of the 1970s and the following upward tic in temperatures, the social engineers became The Global Warming Alarmists and they had found a willing co-conspirator in their scheme of global redistribution of wealth, the weather. Though no one knew precisely why the earth had gone into a cooling spell for a while, the Global Warming Alarmists knew that they could provide a perfectly plausible explanation for the rising temperatures, man.
They could blame the rising temperatures on man, claiming that it was man-made pollution. And if it was man-made pollution, it could be taxed and regulated. And then those taxes could be used to fund their utopian dreams of fairness and equality by the global redistribution of wealth.
But there was only one hitch in their plan. They were caught off guard when the global warming stopped, even as CO2 levels were rising and actually greening the earth. Yep, that’s right, global warming stopped 17 years ago. But don’t let a little thing like the truth get in the way of the Global Warming Alarmists. They just ignore the data, in every way conceivable but one, name. Though they won’t admit that temperatures have not risen for 210 months, they did change their name to accommodate the change.
The Global Warming Alarmist now like to call themselves Climate Change Alarmist because “climate change” can be used as a two-edged sword. Climate change, or as some people like to call it, the weather, can be used to defend global redistribution of wealth whether temperatures go up or whether temperatures go down. In a diabolical sort of way, it’s brilliant.
Proving that the two-edged sword of climate change can be useful, they used it to blame the record low temperatures across the U.S. on global warming. Even the Obama Administration got in on the act stating at an official White House blog, “we also know that this week’s cold spell is of a type there’s reason to believe may become more frequent in a world that’s getting warmer, on average, because of greenhouse-gas pollution.“
Not leaving the global warming issue alone, The Obama White House recently announced a new climate change data website in hopes of convincing the American people that the Global Warming Alarmists are justified in their global redistribution of wealth endeavor.
U.S. Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) has another take on the global warming situation and President Obama’s expenditures. At a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, he estimated that the Obama Administration has wasted as much as $120 Billion on the environmental agenda, mostly global warming. And with much of that going to cronies and campaign donation bundlers in failed green energy projects.
The Global Warming Alarmist have been trying to perpetrate the biggest fraud on the unsuspecting people of the world on the most grandest of scales. It is a fraud and should be dealt with as such.
The global warming hoax is the multifarious means by which the Global Warming Alarmists’ ingenuity has devised, and which has been resorted to by individuals, groups, and governments to get an advantage over others by false suggestions and suppression of the truth. It includes surprises, tricks, disguises and concealing any and all unfair ways by which others can be cheated of wealth for global redistribution.
The deceitful conduct of the Global Warming Alarmists is designed to manipulate others by lying and by repeating something that is or ought to be known by others as false or suspect, and by concealing facts from others which may save them from being cheated through the global redistribution of wealth. The existence of their fraud should cause the courts to give rise to their criminal liability.
The Global Warming Alarmists have organized, campaigned, and committed crimes against humanity to undermine the public’s ability to develop and voice informed opinions. They are guilty of negligence in their willful disregard for human life and free speech. They are morally bankrupt, criminally fraudulent, and hopelessly without redemption.
Rehabilitation is unlikely, probably even impossible, and efforts to restore them to useful life impractical. Were it not for the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution that prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, the lot of them should be…
Hey, wait a minute. What do you know? Maybe The Nutty Professor did have a good idea. Maybe “it is time for modern societies to interpret and update their legal systems accordingly.” We could update the Eighth. Maybe keelhauling wouldn’t be so cruel and unusual after all.