Hobby Lobby 1 Obama The Abortionist 0

Hobby Lobby 1 Obama The Abortionist 0

Obama’s probably a little bummed that the Supreme Court overruled his Hobby Lobby contraception mandate. Sociopaths have a tendency to get a little angry when things don’t go their way. They do things, unspeakable things. So far, no leaked word yet from the White House of the unspeakable acts committed there within. His minions are, if anything, loyal. Plus, the people’s house, the White House, has sub-basements, sure to stifle any screams of terror that might emanate from down below. I’ll bet it’s hot down there, very hot. Because Obama’s hot and madder than hell. And he’s angry to boot.

Though the recent Supreme Court’s decision was a big win for Hobby Lobby, there are still thousands upon thousands of people who may be forced by Obamacare to participate in the murder of their own grandchildren. Under the Affordable Care Act, parents can keep their kids on their policy until those children reach the age of 26. And if that child of theirs decides to have an abortion that destroys the life growing in the womb, so be it. Just send the bill to the would-be grandma and grandpa.

Would-be Grandmas and Grandpas do have an out though. They can stop claiming the abortion-minded child as a dependent, thereby forcing the child to seek their own health insurance. That’s probably easier to do once that child has reached 18, but I’m sure that the government would be happy to provide that person with affordable healthcare and even subsidize that healthcare when necessary.

Remember the State of the Union in 2009 when Obama said that no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions? I do. I remember. Anyone receiving an Obamacare subsidy though is receiving federal dollars, federal tax money. Money that is taken by force from the U.S. federal government to fund the murderous killing of helpless innocent babies in the womb.

Bob Unruh wrote about the Supreme Court Hobby Lobby vs. Obamacare decision over at WND:

The U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision Monday ruled that a “closely held” for-profit business can opt out of Obamacare’s controversial contraception requirement based on religious objections.

Hobby Lobby’s argument was based on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or RFRA, which protects the individual beliefs of citizens.

The majority opinion by Justice Samuel Alito dismissed the Department of Health and Human Services argument that the companies cannot sue because they are for-profit corporations and that the owners cannot sue because the regulations apply only to the companies. Alito said that “would leave merchants with a difficult choice: give up the right to seek judicial protection of their religious liberty or forgo the benefits of operating as corporations.”

The opinion said the RFRA’s text “shows that Congress designed the statute to provide very broad protection for religious liberty and did not intend to put merchants to such a choice.”

Alito said “the purpose of extending rights to corporations is to protect the rights of people associated with the corporation, including shareholders, officers, and employees.”

“Protecting the free-exercise rights of closely held corporations thus protects the religious liberty of humans who own and control them.”

The opinion said while the dissent argues RFRA does not cover Conestoga, Hobby Lobby and Mardel, an affiliate company of Hobby Lobby, because they cannot “exercise religion,” the justices “offer no persuasive explanation for this conclusion.”

“The corporate form alone cannot explain it because RFRA indisputable protects nonprofit corporations. And the profit-making objective of the corporations cannot explain it because the court has entertained the free-exercise claims of individuals who were attempting to make a profit as retail merchants.”

The court said that “business practices compelled or limited by the tenets of a religious doctrine fall comfortably within the understanding of the ‘exercise of religion.’”

While the court ruling was not a sweeping First Amendment freedom of religion ruling, it concluded: “HHS’s contraceptive mandate substantially burdens the exercise of religion.”

“It requires the Hahns and Greens to engage in conduct that seriously violates their sincere religious belief that life begins at conception.”

The opinion made clear the priority of protecting religion.

“RFRA’s question is whether the mandate imposes a substantial burden on the objecting parties’ ability to conduct business in accordance with their religious beliefs. … It is not for the court to say that the religious beliefs of the plaintiffs are mistaken or unreasonable.”

Joining Alito were Chief Justice John Roberts, whose determination two years that Obamacare was a tax saved the law, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.

The opinion concluded that if the government is demanding free abortion-inducing drugs for women, it should pay for them.

Continue reading at WND

Continue reading

Advertisements

Democrats Party And Embrace Convicted Votor Fraud Felon Poll Worker

vote early vote often vote democrat

Melowese Richardson, a Hamilton County poll worker convicted of voter fraud after voting for Barrack Obama more that once in the 2012 election, took the stage at a local voting rights rally to kick-off the Ohio Voters’ Bill of Rights Ohio Constitutional amendment. Apparently, voting once is not enough. It is rumoured that their new campaign slogan will be, “Vote Early! Vote Often! Vote Democrat!

Melowese had served only eight months of a five-year sentence after being convicted for voting twice in the 2012 presidential election. She was also convicted of voting three times (in 2008, 2011, and 2012) for her sister, who has been in a coma since 2003. Perhaps she has a way of communicating with her comatose sister that doctors aren’t aware of and was able to discern her sister’s voting preferences.

Said Melowese prior to her 2013 conviction, “I’ll fight it for Mr. Obama and Mr. Obama’s right to sit as president of the United States.” Apparently, she didn’t have that much of a fight in her. Even though she was represented by the George Soros-funded Ohio Justice and Policy Center, the evidence piled up against Melowese and she accepted a plea deal to four counts of voter fraud. Perhaps her interview with Cincinnati’s Channel 9 in February 2013 where she admitted to voting twice in the 2012 election had something to do with that.

The Rev. Al Sharpton of Tawana Brawley hoax fame and race-baiter extraordinaire was the keynote speaker at last week’s rally where more that 450 people showed up. “Nobody gave us the right to vote,” Sharpton said,  “and nobody is going to give it to us now. We fought for it and we’re going to fight for our right to keep it.

Sharpton, not the sharpest tack in the room, continually and conveniently forgets the history of the black voters’ rights movement. It was the Republican party that led the way to give the right to vote to citizens of color.

 

Continue reading

Constitution Has Lasted 400 Years Says Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas)

Sheila Jackson Lee I am a queen and the US Constitution is 400 years old

Well, Congress was having a nice little chat amongst themselves about trying to get the President to enforce the laws, which are his executive obligation, and that some say he has forsaken, when the good gentlewoman from Texas, Democratic Congresswoman Ms. Sheila Jackson Lee, stepped up to the podium and said,

“Maybe I should offer a good thanks to the distinguished members of the majority, the Republicans, my chairman and others, for giving us an opportunity to have a deliberative constitutional discussion that reinforces the sanctity of this nation and how well it is that we have lasted some 400 years, operating under a constitution that clearly defines what is constitutional and what is not,”

Four hundred years? Did I hear that right? We’ve been operating under a Constitution for 400 years? Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) is supposed to be an educated woman. Is it possible that her Ivy League (Yale) education failed her? She purportedly has a law degree from the University of Virginia School of Law. Did her failings at Yale go undetected by her law professors? Do they even teach Constitutional law there in the home state of the man who wrote the Constitution and founded the very school from which she is alleged to have graduated?

It’s got to make you wonder what she went to law school for. Surely it wasn’t to learn about the Constitution. And surely it wasnt to discover what the Constitution clearly defines and what it does not. Sadly, in America, apparently you don’t need to know the Constitution to know the law to either legislate it, practice it, or sit in a judicial capacity. You just have to think you do. And Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) thinks she knows, she thinks she knows a lot more than she really does.

What she does know about the Constitution is what she can read from between the lines and from the invisible ink that she sees so clearly in her warped sense of juris prudence. She’s kind of like the Barney Fife of the legislative process, but in all fairness to Barney Fife that would be an insult to Barney Fife.

Fortunately, Ms Sheila Jackson Lee’s (D-TX) lesson in history held no sway and the “Enforce the Law Act of 2014” was passed.

H.R. 4138, or the “Chief Executive Who Doesn’t Faithfully Observe and Respect Congressional Enactments Needs to Get Off of His Ass and Take Care of Business Like He Should and Enforce the Law Act of 2014,” passed in the US House of Representative 233-181.

The bill now goes to the Senate where the chances of this bill passing are about as great President Obama actually obeying the law as he has not yet found that responsibility to be of his liking. However, he still does like playing golf a lot, shopping at the GAP, and long midnight strolls on the beach “alone.”

Continue reading

Georgia Leads the Way on States’ Rights: 1st to Pass Article V Resolution

Liberty Bell Geogia Gusrdians of Liberty

Somebody tell the good folks in Philadelphia to ring the Liberty Bell because Georgia is the first state in history to pass a resolution that calls for a Convention of States which proposes Constitutional amendments. A Convention of States, called a constitutional convention by many,  can be convened when requested by two-thirds of the states.

The Georgia Resolution states:

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF
 GEORGIA that the General Assembly of the State of Georgia hereby applies to Congress,
 under the provisions of Article V of the Constitution of the United States, for the calling of
 a convention of the states limited to proposing amendments to the United States Constitution
 that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of
 the federal government, and limit the terms of office for its officials and for members of
 Congress.

Citing that “the founders of the Constitution of the United States empowered state legislators to be guardians of liberty against future abuses of power by the federal government,” the legislators have started the ball rolling to use one of the two ways that proposals to Constitution may be made as described in Article V of the Constitution.

Up until now the tried and true method of proposing amendments to the Constitution has been the domain of Congress where two-thirds of both the Senate and the House of Representatives are required. Ratifying an amendment then requires three-fourths of the states for approval.

Not all amendment proposals are approved. Remember the ERA Amendment? Only 35 states of the required 38 ratified that amendment. Congress had put a time limit on ratification and it expired in 1982 before it could be approved.

Best-selling author and nationally syndicated conservative radio talk show host Mark Levin first proposed a constitutional convention using Article V of the Constitution to add amendments in his book “The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic,” where he suggested adding eleven.

State Representative Buzz Brockway (R-Lawrenceville), the resolution’s primary sponsor in the Georgia House said,

Continue reading