Hobby Lobby 1 Obama The Abortionist 0

Hobby Lobby 1 Obama The Abortionist 0

Obama’s probably a little bummed that the Supreme Court overruled his Hobby Lobby contraception mandate. Sociopaths have a tendency to get a little angry when things don’t go their way. They do things, unspeakable things. So far, no leaked word yet from the White House of the unspeakable acts committed there within. His minions are, if anything, loyal. Plus, the people’s house, the White House, has sub-basements, sure to stifle any screams of terror that might emanate from down below. I’ll bet it’s hot down there, very hot. Because Obama’s hot and madder than hell. And he’s angry to boot.

Though the recent Supreme Court’s decision was a big win for Hobby Lobby, there are still thousands upon thousands of people who may be forced by Obamacare to participate in the murder of their own grandchildren. Under the Affordable Care Act, parents can keep their kids on their policy until those children reach the age of 26. And if that child of theirs decides to have an abortion that destroys the life growing in the womb, so be it. Just send the bill to the would-be grandma and grandpa.

Would-be Grandmas and Grandpas do have an out though. They can stop claiming the abortion-minded child as a dependent, thereby forcing the child to seek their own health insurance. That’s probably easier to do once that child has reached 18, but I’m sure that the government would be happy to provide that person with affordable healthcare and even subsidize that healthcare when necessary.

Remember the State of the Union in 2009 when Obama said that no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions? I do. I remember. Anyone receiving an Obamacare subsidy though is receiving federal dollars, federal tax money. Money that is taken by force from the U.S. federal government to fund the murderous killing of helpless innocent babies in the womb.

Bob Unruh wrote about the Supreme Court Hobby Lobby vs. Obamacare decision over at WND:

The U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision Monday ruled that a “closely held” for-profit business can opt out of Obamacare’s controversial contraception requirement based on religious objections.

Hobby Lobby’s argument was based on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or RFRA, which protects the individual beliefs of citizens.

The majority opinion by Justice Samuel Alito dismissed the Department of Health and Human Services argument that the companies cannot sue because they are for-profit corporations and that the owners cannot sue because the regulations apply only to the companies. Alito said that “would leave merchants with a difficult choice: give up the right to seek judicial protection of their religious liberty or forgo the benefits of operating as corporations.”

The opinion said the RFRA’s text “shows that Congress designed the statute to provide very broad protection for religious liberty and did not intend to put merchants to such a choice.”

Alito said “the purpose of extending rights to corporations is to protect the rights of people associated with the corporation, including shareholders, officers, and employees.”

“Protecting the free-exercise rights of closely held corporations thus protects the religious liberty of humans who own and control them.”

The opinion said while the dissent argues RFRA does not cover Conestoga, Hobby Lobby and Mardel, an affiliate company of Hobby Lobby, because they cannot “exercise religion,” the justices “offer no persuasive explanation for this conclusion.”

“The corporate form alone cannot explain it because RFRA indisputable protects nonprofit corporations. And the profit-making objective of the corporations cannot explain it because the court has entertained the free-exercise claims of individuals who were attempting to make a profit as retail merchants.”

The court said that “business practices compelled or limited by the tenets of a religious doctrine fall comfortably within the understanding of the ‘exercise of religion.’”

While the court ruling was not a sweeping First Amendment freedom of religion ruling, it concluded: “HHS’s contraceptive mandate substantially burdens the exercise of religion.”

“It requires the Hahns and Greens to engage in conduct that seriously violates their sincere religious belief that life begins at conception.”

The opinion made clear the priority of protecting religion.

“RFRA’s question is whether the mandate imposes a substantial burden on the objecting parties’ ability to conduct business in accordance with their religious beliefs. … It is not for the court to say that the religious beliefs of the plaintiffs are mistaken or unreasonable.”

Joining Alito were Chief Justice John Roberts, whose determination two years that Obamacare was a tax saved the law, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.

The opinion concluded that if the government is demanding free abortion-inducing drugs for women, it should pay for them.

Continue reading at WND

Continue reading

The Nutty Professor Says Funding of Global Warming Denialism Criminally Negligent

global warming denier behind bars

An assistant Professor of Philosophy at Rochester Institute of Technology, The Nutty Professor, Lawarence Torcello,  says that the funding of global warming denialism is both criminally and morally wrong. He further adds, writing at The Conversation, that “the charge of criminal and moral negligence ought to extend to all activities of the climate deniers who receive funding as part of a sustained campaign to undermine the public’s understanding of scientific consensus.”

In another time and place this nutty professor might have been an Assistant Professor of Eugenics and might have worked for another type of organization where Racial Hygiene and Race Superiority denialism was both criminally and morally wrong.

And in that time, perhaps the charge of criminal and moral negligence was extended to all activities of the Racial Hygiene and Race Superiority deniers who would have received funding as part of a sustained campaign to undermine the public’s understanding of racially based social policy scientific consensus.

Jah. How do you plead? Never mind. No matter. There will be no trial. You are guilty of denialism. You will be executed at dawn for the good of the people.

And yes, perhaps, in the early part of the 20th century had there been more funding for Racial Hygiene and Race Superiority denialism “The Rockefeller Foundation would not have helped, developed, and funded various German eugenics programs, including the one that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz.Yes, if only.

Perhaps if more people back then had understood the result from the failures in avoiding reasonably foreseeable harms, or the threat of harms to public safety, consequent of certain activities, more than thirty states would not have forced sterilization on its populace and so enamoured 1930s Germany. If only.

In the crazy corrupt and deceitful world of The Nutty Professor, those who purposefully strive to make sure inexact, incomplete, and contradictory information is given to the public are beyond reproach and those that would promote scientific debate debased.

From their point of view, the debate is over. They choose to deny others their free speech. But not to worry though. It’s only a smoke screen. They are worried. They won’t debate because they can’t debate. The debate is over only because they have already lost. But, of course, they won’t tell you that.

The ever louder screams though of climate change by the Global Warming Alarmists are only the result of the failed policies from the deluded minds of social engineers that think that they can still use global warming as an excuse for wealth redistribution on a global scale.

The social engineers want you to spend billions, even trillions of dollars on the global warming initiative, all in the name of equality and fairness.

There are the Three Laws of Global Warming Alarmists:

  • Global warming is a hoax that must be perpetrated for the good of the people
  • Global warming deniers must be savagely condemned for the good of the people
  • Global redistribution of wealth must be accomplished for the good of the people

They will disguise their intentions with feel-good slogans and ideology like cap and trade and save the planet. They will play saint to your villain if you disagree with them.

Continue reading

Goodbye Internet! Goodbye Free Speech! Hello NWO! Hello .Collectivisim Hello .Politburo Hello .Jihad

Buh Bye Internet

President Obama is at it once again, engaging in his favorite pastime, ensuring that the United States is advancing towards non-exceptionalism at warp speed, or in this case at the speed of light, by way of fiber optic cable and the Internet

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) of the U.S. Department of Commerce made an announcement Friday afternoon that it was relinquishing control of the administration of the Internet. It will be turning over control of the Internet’s domain naming system (DNS) that oversees Internet Protocol (IP) addresses and domain names. NTIA’s obligation includes the procedural role of administering changes to the authoritative root zone file, which is the database containing the list of names and addresses of all top-level domains.

Developed in the 1960s, the Internet grew from a Defense Department program, ARPANET, and U.S. has maintained control over certain elements since its inception. Under a privatization process that began with Bill Clinton in 1997, ICANN was created in 1998 and it was intended to eventually migrate it to international control. That day will soon be upon us as the migration has begun.

Presently, the NTIA’s responsibility for the technical system named the Internet Assignment Numbers Authority (IANA) has been contracted out to the Internet Corporation of Internet Names and Numbers (ICCAN) under a biennial contract that expires in 2015. ICANN is charged with maintaining the IP address numbering system which computers use and turning those numbers into names that humans can understand, like .com, .org., or .net. Recently, those familiar names got some company with the addition of hundreds of new name like  .ninja, .farm, .shoes, .photography, .bike, .pink, and even .wtf.

In its statement NTIA has asked ICANN to “transition key Internet domain name functions to the global multistakeholder community,” and “to convene global stakeholders to develop a proposal to transition the current role played by NTIA in the coordination of the Internet’s domain name system (DNS).

NTIA also stated that it “will not accept a proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a government-led or an inter-governmental organization solution.” It wants to be consistent with the “clear policy expressed in bipartisan resolutions of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives (S.Con.Res.50 and H.Con.Res.127), which affirmed the United States support for the multistakeholder model of Internet governance.

ICANN is expected to work with organizations directly affected, including the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the Internet Architecture Board (IAB), the Internet Society (ISOC), the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs), top level domain name operators, VeriSign, and other interested global stakeholders.

Continue reading

Rutgers Faculty and Students Hate Black Woman: Intolerant of Free Speech

Rutgers The Hate University of New JerseyFaculty and students at Rutgers University in New Jersey are demonstrating their “enlightened” sense of tolerance by protesting the former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s invitation to speak at the 2014 Rutgers commencement ceremony later this year.

The Faculty Council of Hate Speech at Rutgers’ New Brunswick campus is trying to have the invitation rescinded. They are joined in their efforts by students who are also condemning Ms. Rice as commencement speaker and the New Brunswick Faculty Council of Hate Speech is hoping that other members of their cabal in Camden and Newark will join them as well.

The Council passed a resolution last week asking the university’s Board of Governors to have Rice dragged off in chains and flogged for daring to express an opposing view to “The Tolerant Ones,” as the Council members call themselves.

“Intolerance is our weapon and deceit our shield,” said one disgruntled faculty member. Another said that, “being the first black woman to serve as National Security Adviser and the nation’s Secretary of State will offer her no relief for her transgressions.”

“Her resistance to groupthink is an abomination to academia,” one professor retorted as his fellow academics approvingly nodded their heads in unison.

Continue reading

So Goes The Ninth

Aztlan Map with Flags The mighty Ninth Legion of the Roman army is rumoured to have disappeared.

They merely vanished one day off of the face of the earth with their beloved Roman Standard, the Eagle of the Ninth Legion.

If were we only so lucky.

While we may not have a legion, we do have our Ninth, as in the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Their ruling came down recently against a group of students wearing US flag shirts at a California high school on Cinco De Mayo where a Mexican heritage celebration was being observed.

The young men were rounded up that day because of their offensive speech.

I’ll bet some of them were speechless.

Why were they flagged for offensive speech by Assistant Principal Senior Miguel Rodriguez?

What did they say? Good question.

Continue reading

Open Carry – “I Got A Squash”

911 Scary Squash 544 X 345“911. What’s your emergency?”

“Ummm… there are some scary men walking around town.”

“Scary men, ma’am? What kind of men?”

“Scary men.”

“I understand that, ma’am. What are they doing?”

“They’re walking around town.”

“And that scares you, ma’am?”

“No.”

“Then how are they scaring you, ma’am?”

“It’s what they’re carrying that scares me.”

“And what is it, ma’am, that they’re carrying?”

“A squash.”

“A squash, ma’am? And that’s scares you?”

“No. It’s how they’re carrying it.”

“And how is it, ma’am, that they’re carrying this squash?”

“In a gun holster. They are openly carrying this big squash in a gun holster.”

“And that scares you, ma’am?”

“Yes, I’m terrified. It looks menacing.”

“Alright, ma’am, hang tight. I’ll send an officer right over.”

Well, it really wasn’t the open carry of squash that got the cops called on some men in Austin, Texas recently. But it was some men that were exercising their right to openly carry their long guns (which is entirely legal in the state of Texas) that did.

Continue reading