Hobby Lobby 1 Obama The Abortionist 0

Hobby Lobby 1 Obama The Abortionist 0

Obama’s probably a little bummed that the Supreme Court overruled his Hobby Lobby contraception mandate. Sociopaths have a tendency to get a little angry when things don’t go their way. They do things, unspeakable things. So far, no leaked word yet from the White House of the unspeakable acts committed there within. His minions are, if anything, loyal. Plus, the people’s house, the White House, has sub-basements, sure to stifle any screams of terror that might emanate from down below. I’ll bet it’s hot down there, very hot. Because Obama’s hot and madder than hell. And he’s angry to boot.

Though the recent Supreme Court’s decision was a big win for Hobby Lobby, there are still thousands upon thousands of people who may be forced by Obamacare to participate in the murder of their own grandchildren. Under the Affordable Care Act, parents can keep their kids on their policy until those children reach the age of 26. And if that child of theirs decides to have an abortion that destroys the life growing in the womb, so be it. Just send the bill to the would-be grandma and grandpa.

Would-be Grandmas and Grandpas do have an out though. They can stop claiming the abortion-minded child as a dependent, thereby forcing the child to seek their own health insurance. That’s probably easier to do once that child has reached 18, but I’m sure that the government would be happy to provide that person with affordable healthcare and even subsidize that healthcare when necessary.

Remember the State of the Union in 2009 when Obama said that no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions? I do. I remember. Anyone receiving an Obamacare subsidy though is receiving federal dollars, federal tax money. Money that is taken by force from the U.S. federal government to fund the murderous killing of helpless innocent babies in the womb.

Bob Unruh wrote about the Supreme Court Hobby Lobby vs. Obamacare decision over at WND:

The U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision Monday ruled that a “closely held” for-profit business can opt out of Obamacare’s controversial contraception requirement based on religious objections.

Hobby Lobby’s argument was based on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or RFRA, which protects the individual beliefs of citizens.

The majority opinion by Justice Samuel Alito dismissed the Department of Health and Human Services argument that the companies cannot sue because they are for-profit corporations and that the owners cannot sue because the regulations apply only to the companies. Alito said that “would leave merchants with a difficult choice: give up the right to seek judicial protection of their religious liberty or forgo the benefits of operating as corporations.”

The opinion said the RFRA’s text “shows that Congress designed the statute to provide very broad protection for religious liberty and did not intend to put merchants to such a choice.”

Alito said “the purpose of extending rights to corporations is to protect the rights of people associated with the corporation, including shareholders, officers, and employees.”

“Protecting the free-exercise rights of closely held corporations thus protects the religious liberty of humans who own and control them.”

The opinion said while the dissent argues RFRA does not cover Conestoga, Hobby Lobby and Mardel, an affiliate company of Hobby Lobby, because they cannot “exercise religion,” the justices “offer no persuasive explanation for this conclusion.”

“The corporate form alone cannot explain it because RFRA indisputable protects nonprofit corporations. And the profit-making objective of the corporations cannot explain it because the court has entertained the free-exercise claims of individuals who were attempting to make a profit as retail merchants.”

The court said that “business practices compelled or limited by the tenets of a religious doctrine fall comfortably within the understanding of the ‘exercise of religion.’”

While the court ruling was not a sweeping First Amendment freedom of religion ruling, it concluded: “HHS’s contraceptive mandate substantially burdens the exercise of religion.”

“It requires the Hahns and Greens to engage in conduct that seriously violates their sincere religious belief that life begins at conception.”

The opinion made clear the priority of protecting religion.

“RFRA’s question is whether the mandate imposes a substantial burden on the objecting parties’ ability to conduct business in accordance with their religious beliefs. … It is not for the court to say that the religious beliefs of the plaintiffs are mistaken or unreasonable.”

Joining Alito were Chief Justice John Roberts, whose determination two years that Obamacare was a tax saved the law, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.

The opinion concluded that if the government is demanding free abortion-inducing drugs for women, it should pay for them.

Continue reading at WND

Continue reading

HHS: Obamacare Not Delayed! Pssst. Hey Bub, Want a Delay?

julia hhs obamacare mandate loophole

On Wedesday, Katheleen Sebelius appeared before Congress and said that there would be no more delays with the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare. But there’s a hitch with that. A delay may not be a delay.

Okay, when is a delay not a delay? When it’s a “hardship,” that’s when. Just about everybody has experienced a hardship or two of one type or another at some point in their lives. I mean, nobody’s life is perfect, right?. Surely, everybody gets into a little trouble every now and again. Well, almost everybody. I guess maybe there are few saints left, but I haven’t met any of them.

For the rest of the world it’s like, where’s your homework? The dog ate it. Your payment is late. I got robbed. Or your significant other finds out you were with someone else. It wasn’t me. All sorts of things can happen.

It turns out that the Obama Administration understands this all too well and is willing to forgive us our trespasses as we would forgive those who trespass against us. Obama is hoping that we will especially forgive him and the Democrats before the upcoming election later this year where a whole slew of Senate seats are up in play.

Released unceremoniously earlier this month by Health and Human Services (HHS) was the Application for Exemption from the Shared Responsibility Payment for Individuals who Experience Hardships. The application form gives the obligatory Obamacare rundown such as explaining that in 2014 everybody is supposed to have health coverage or make a payment on their federal income tax return and what not. Then goes on to say that some people are exempt. It further says that you can the use this application to “apply for an exemption from the shared responsibility payment.” For those of you not familiar with the new governmentspeak, a shared responsibility payment is a tax. It’s your tax. You know, your fair share.
Please note: From the glorious laborings of the progressive and liberal mind (the enlightened ones), never use three letters when describing something when you can use three words. Multisyllable words are preferred.

The application then goes on to list hardship categories and documentation that’s required and says that “You may qualify for a hardship exemption if you experienced one of the following” and goes on to list: you were homeless, or you were evicted in the last six months or were facing eviction or foreclosure, or got a shutoff notice from a utility company, or you experienced domestic violence, bankruptcy, medical bills in the last 24 months, increased expenses due to caring for an ill, disabled, or aging family member, or your current health plan is being cancelled and you can’t afford another plan (even though Obamacare was signed into law as the “Affordable Care Act”).

All but two or three hardships require documentation be submitted with your exemption application. If you are homeless or have experienced domestic violence, then no documentation is required.

And if none of the above fits your hardship classification, they’ve got a category for that too, it’s kind of a catch-all, if you know what I mean. If you’ve experienced another hardship in obtaining health  insurance (wink wink, nudge nudge), well that’s covered. They would like for you to submit documentation for that, if possible (wink wink, nudge nudge). No documentation? No problem. That sounds alarmingly familiar, doesn’t it? Just like our immigration policy, right?

HHS Obamacare loophole hardship exemption

With so many delays so far (there’s been almost 40 changes total to Obamacare), it’s a wonder that there’s anything left for the Democrats to crow about to their dwindling body politic. “We want healthcare! When do we want it? Eh, whenever.

Continue reading

Celebrating National Genocide Executioners Appreciation Day

Planned Genocide No Thank You

There’s a national holiday during Women’s History Month that celebrates abortionists, their enablers, and their minions. March 10th was declared National Abortion Provider Appreciation Day in 1996 to give thanks and adulation to those who carry out the genocide of unsuspecting unborn human beings.

Since the landmark decision of Roe v. Wade in 1973 by the United States Supreme Court there have been more than 57 million abortions performed.  Genocide aptly describes the procedure of abortion as it can be defined as “the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.”

In a paper presented by Gregory Stanton of Genocide Watch in 1996 to the United States Department of State called “The 8 Stages of Genocide,” Stanton describes Stage 7 as Extermination.  “It is ‘extermination’ to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human.”

To the pro-abortionists, unborn babies are nothing more than a “product of conception,” and disposable on demand. They dare not call the fetus human, as that would indicate that the not fully formed human being in the womb to be deserving of a right to life that they so eagerly deny.

Planned Parenthood, or Extermination Camp PP, being celebrated by the genocide executioner appreciationists, celebrated an anniversary of it own recently, observing almost 100 years of advocating fetus removal (i.e., birth control).

Their early years were dominated by Margaret Sanger, a staunch eugenicist. She establish the first birth control clinic in 1916 in Brooklyn, New York and the American Birth Control League in 1921, which later on morphed into Planned Parenthood. Apparently somewhere along the way the title American Birth Control League was found too offensive and “against families,” so in good liberal tradition, the name was changed.

Eugenicists believe in the practice of improving the genetic quality of the human population. That sounds all well and good until their desired methods are scrutinized. In Nazi Germany of the last century, if you were of blonde hair, blue eyes, and of pure Aryan blood, you were encouraged to procreate, freely and often. That’s the part of the eugenics social philosophy that advocates the improvement of human genetic traits through the promotion of higher reproduction of people with desired traits. For ten years (1935-1945),  the “Lebensborn” Program flourished, Lebensborn meaning “wellspring of life” or “fountain or life.”

For years the German population was in decline. The project’s goal was to increase the population of the Germanic/Normandic people and to insure that it was “racially pure.” The start of this program, founded by Heinrich Himmler, began in the same year that intermarriage with Jews and others who were deemed inferior was outlawed by the Nuremberg Laws.

The Lebensborn  Eingetragener Verein (Registered Society Lebensborn) gave young girls the opportunity to have children secretly whereupon the child would be whisked away by the SS for education and placement. Both parents had to pass the “purity test” before they could conceive. Family lineage was traced back for at least three generations for both mother and father. Towards the beginning of the project, nearly 58% of the women were unmarried. and about halfway through it had climbed to somewhere near 70%.

Does that 70% figure sound hauntingly familiar to you? It should. That’s because 72% of births by black women today are to unwed mothers. And those are the lucky ones. Because if you are an unborn child in NYC your chances of being aborted are greater than being born.

Continue reading