Hobby Lobby 1 Obama The Abortionist 0

Hobby Lobby 1 Obama The Abortionist 0

Obama’s probably a little bummed that the Supreme Court overruled his Hobby Lobby contraception mandate. Sociopaths have a tendency to get a little angry when things don’t go their way. They do things, unspeakable things. So far, no leaked word yet from the White House of the unspeakable acts committed there within. His minions are, if anything, loyal. Plus, the people’s house, the White House, has sub-basements, sure to stifle any screams of terror that might emanate from down below. I’ll bet it’s hot down there, very hot. Because Obama’s hot and madder than hell. And he’s angry to boot.

Though the recent Supreme Court’s decision was a big win for Hobby Lobby, there are still thousands upon thousands of people who may be forced by Obamacare to participate in the murder of their own grandchildren. Under the Affordable Care Act, parents can keep their kids on their policy until those children reach the age of 26. And if that child of theirs decides to have an abortion that destroys the life growing in the womb, so be it. Just send the bill to the would-be grandma and grandpa.

Would-be Grandmas and Grandpas do have an out though. They can stop claiming the abortion-minded child as a dependent, thereby forcing the child to seek their own health insurance. That’s probably easier to do once that child has reached 18, but I’m sure that the government would be happy to provide that person with affordable healthcare and even subsidize that healthcare when necessary.

Remember the State of the Union in 2009 when Obama said that no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions? I do. I remember. Anyone receiving an Obamacare subsidy though is receiving federal dollars, federal tax money. Money that is taken by force from the U.S. federal government to fund the murderous killing of helpless innocent babies in the womb.

Bob Unruh wrote about the Supreme Court Hobby Lobby vs. Obamacare decision over at WND:

The U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision Monday ruled that a “closely held” for-profit business can opt out of Obamacare’s controversial contraception requirement based on religious objections.

Hobby Lobby’s argument was based on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or RFRA, which protects the individual beliefs of citizens.

The majority opinion by Justice Samuel Alito dismissed the Department of Health and Human Services argument that the companies cannot sue because they are for-profit corporations and that the owners cannot sue because the regulations apply only to the companies. Alito said that “would leave merchants with a difficult choice: give up the right to seek judicial protection of their religious liberty or forgo the benefits of operating as corporations.”

The opinion said the RFRA’s text “shows that Congress designed the statute to provide very broad protection for religious liberty and did not intend to put merchants to such a choice.”

Alito said “the purpose of extending rights to corporations is to protect the rights of people associated with the corporation, including shareholders, officers, and employees.”

“Protecting the free-exercise rights of closely held corporations thus protects the religious liberty of humans who own and control them.”

The opinion said while the dissent argues RFRA does not cover Conestoga, Hobby Lobby and Mardel, an affiliate company of Hobby Lobby, because they cannot “exercise religion,” the justices “offer no persuasive explanation for this conclusion.”

“The corporate form alone cannot explain it because RFRA indisputable protects nonprofit corporations. And the profit-making objective of the corporations cannot explain it because the court has entertained the free-exercise claims of individuals who were attempting to make a profit as retail merchants.”

The court said that “business practices compelled or limited by the tenets of a religious doctrine fall comfortably within the understanding of the ‘exercise of religion.’”

While the court ruling was not a sweeping First Amendment freedom of religion ruling, it concluded: “HHS’s contraceptive mandate substantially burdens the exercise of religion.”

“It requires the Hahns and Greens to engage in conduct that seriously violates their sincere religious belief that life begins at conception.”

The opinion made clear the priority of protecting religion.

“RFRA’s question is whether the mandate imposes a substantial burden on the objecting parties’ ability to conduct business in accordance with their religious beliefs. … It is not for the court to say that the religious beliefs of the plaintiffs are mistaken or unreasonable.”

Joining Alito were Chief Justice John Roberts, whose determination two years that Obamacare was a tax saved the law, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.

The opinion concluded that if the government is demanding free abortion-inducing drugs for women, it should pay for them.

Continue reading at WND

Continue reading

Advertisements

Green Energy Plan Incinerates Aborted Babies To Heat UK Hospitals

soylent green energy fair share people volunteer today

In what must be a win-win for the progressive liberal left-wing green energy pro-abortion culture of death crowd, it was announced in the Telegraph that the remains of aborted babies have been used in ‘waste-to-energy’ plants to heat hospitals as part of an energy efficiency program. No word yet from the Obama Administration, or from Health and Human Services (HHS) director Kathleen Sebilius, if they are weighing the cost-saving measures.

The Telegraph reports that, “The remains of more than 15,000 babies were incinerated as ‘clinical waste’ by hospitals in Britain.” Ten trusts of Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) have admitted to burning the fetal remains along with other rubbish. Two other trusts have used the bodies of dead babies in ‘waste-to-energy’ plants which generate power for heat. It is not known if the green energy-from-waste plants are owned by the Soylent Corporation, whose slogan “Green Energy For People IS People” and demands from people to “Do Your Fair Share And Volunteer Today.

Upon hearing of the practice, the Department of Health issued an instant ban on the practice which health minister Dr. Dan Poulter branded ‘totally unacceptable.’ Dr. Poulter did not clarify whether the practice itself was unacceptable or whether the low number of incinerated dead babies was unacceptable.

Over the last two years, at least 15,500 babies have been incinerated by 27 NHS trust, so perhaps the health minister is appalled at the low number of facilities where the dead babies bodies are burned along with the rubbish or are used in green energy-from-waste plants to heat hospitals.

The UK green energy-from-waste plan was brought to light by actress Amanda Holden, a judge on Britain’s Got Talent, in a documentary investigating the treatment of parents who lose children during pregnancy. Holden herself had suffered both a stillbirth and a miscarriage and was unaware of the green energy program. She found out that many parents were not told that the remains were being sent to green energy-from-waste plants, only that the remains were ‘cremated.’

NHS figures show there are around 4,000 stillbirths each year in the UK and that one in seven pregnancies end in miscarriage. If the UK’s green energy-from-waste program is to achieve sustainable levels, those numbers will have to increase. The progressive liberal left-wing green energy pro-abortion movement crowd has their work cutout for them.

New slogans supporting abortion as a green energy-from-waste right are bound to appear.

 

Continue reading

Celebrating National Genocide Executioners Appreciation Day

Planned Genocide No Thank You

There’s a national holiday during Women’s History Month that celebrates abortionists, their enablers, and their minions. March 10th was declared National Abortion Provider Appreciation Day in 1996 to give thanks and adulation to those who carry out the genocide of unsuspecting unborn human beings.

Since the landmark decision of Roe v. Wade in 1973 by the United States Supreme Court there have been more than 57 million abortions performed.  Genocide aptly describes the procedure of abortion as it can be defined as “the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.”

In a paper presented by Gregory Stanton of Genocide Watch in 1996 to the United States Department of State called “The 8 Stages of Genocide,” Stanton describes Stage 7 as Extermination.  “It is ‘extermination’ to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human.”

To the pro-abortionists, unborn babies are nothing more than a “product of conception,” and disposable on demand. They dare not call the fetus human, as that would indicate that the not fully formed human being in the womb to be deserving of a right to life that they so eagerly deny.

Planned Parenthood, or Extermination Camp PP, being celebrated by the genocide executioner appreciationists, celebrated an anniversary of it own recently, observing almost 100 years of advocating fetus removal (i.e., birth control).

Their early years were dominated by Margaret Sanger, a staunch eugenicist. She establish the first birth control clinic in 1916 in Brooklyn, New York and the American Birth Control League in 1921, which later on morphed into Planned Parenthood. Apparently somewhere along the way the title American Birth Control League was found too offensive and “against families,” so in good liberal tradition, the name was changed.

Eugenicists believe in the practice of improving the genetic quality of the human population. That sounds all well and good until their desired methods are scrutinized. In Nazi Germany of the last century, if you were of blonde hair, blue eyes, and of pure Aryan blood, you were encouraged to procreate, freely and often. That’s the part of the eugenics social philosophy that advocates the improvement of human genetic traits through the promotion of higher reproduction of people with desired traits. For ten years (1935-1945),  the “Lebensborn” Program flourished, Lebensborn meaning “wellspring of life” or “fountain or life.”

For years the German population was in decline. The project’s goal was to increase the population of the Germanic/Normandic people and to insure that it was “racially pure.” The start of this program, founded by Heinrich Himmler, began in the same year that intermarriage with Jews and others who were deemed inferior was outlawed by the Nuremberg Laws.

The Lebensborn  Eingetragener Verein (Registered Society Lebensborn) gave young girls the opportunity to have children secretly whereupon the child would be whisked away by the SS for education and placement. Both parents had to pass the “purity test” before they could conceive. Family lineage was traced back for at least three generations for both mother and father. Towards the beginning of the project, nearly 58% of the women were unmarried. and about halfway through it had climbed to somewhere near 70%.

Does that 70% figure sound hauntingly familiar to you? It should. That’s because 72% of births by black women today are to unwed mothers. And those are the lucky ones. Because if you are an unborn child in NYC your chances of being aborted are greater than being born.

Continue reading

IRS Readies to Collect Obamacare Tax, err… Individual Shared Responsibility Payment

IRS Swat

The left and the right. Yin and yang. Good and bad. Right and wrong. If it’s right, it’s individual reponsibility. If it’s left, it’s individual “shared” responsiblity.

What that means is, that for the left there is no responsibility at all. And why should there be?

There is no need to be responsible when other individuals will pick up the tab when you slack off. No health insurance? Obamacare! No money? No problem! Obama will  subsidize you.

And because Obama loves the American people so much, he’s having his friends over the IRS  “remind” us that they will be ready to collect our payments of our individual shared responsibility starting with our 2014 tax returns when filing in 2015.

The Obama administration argued vehemently that the penalty for failing to comply with the individual mandate of the Affordable Care Act was not a tax and they even pursued that argument to the Supreme Court. But not once do I recall anyone referring to it as an individual shared responsibility payment.

Anyways, this is a new year and a time for new things. So, the IRS has decided to help us out here a little bit and has given us a catchy phrase. Apparently the word tax was not enough of a tongue twister, it being too low-brow an’ all, to be acceptable by the Obama administration. And besides, the poor things had worked for so long and so hard claiming that it wasn’t a tax.

But the folks over at Americans for Tax Reform still do. A tax to them is akin to Stein’s rose. Tax is a tax is a tax is a tax.

According to Americans for Tax Reform which caught this a few days ago:

President Obama’s Internal Revenue Service today quietly released a series of Obamacare “Health Care Tax Tips” warning Americans that they must obtain “qualifying” health insurance – as defined by the federal government – or face a “shared responsibility payment” when filing their tax returns in 2015. The term “shared responsibility payment” refers to the Obamacare individual mandate tax, one of at least seven tax hikes in the healthcare law that directly hit families making less than $250,000 per year.

In “Four Tax Facts about the Health Care Law for Individuals” the agency writes:

Your 2014 tax return will ask if you had insurance coverage or qualified for an exemption.  If not, you may owe a shared responsibility payment when you file in 2015.

In “The Individual Shared Responsibility Payment- An Overview” the agency warns Americans they must prove they were covered each and every month of the year:

For any month in 2014 that you or any of your dependents don’t maintain coverage and don’t qualify for an exemption, you will need to make an individual shared responsibility payment with your 2014 tax return filed in 2015.

Calling it something else doesn’t make it any better nor does it help the American public forget what it really is. It’s a tax, plain and simple.

Continue reading